Is there something intrinsic in a word that suits something more than something else.I mean I don’t see myself rooting for Tom Cruise as the governor of California(though Arnold seems to have made it but then he had the muscles to bash my theory to bits).There is something in the name that would only suit a sleek looking heart throb of millions than it would a priest (as he briefly intended to become but I am sure his own name influenced him into thinking otherwise).What is the appeal in one arrangement of letters that isn’t there in another.It might need some careful investigation maybe by a secret agency appointed by the government(to their own benefit,that ways they can ensure a whole race of politicions by simply christening them with the most suitable names or enhance their own political careers by under going a name change and forcing south Korean leaders to chage theirs to less amiable ones ).

And if u are still wondering as to what the deal is,why is this guy rambling on about names.I better remind u dude that having read so far into the article u will only be denigrating ur own sensibilities by cursing mine.

Did anyone know that Harry Houdini was actually named Ehrich Weiss,now that was a smart move. wasn't it? who would ever have remembered a weiss as the great magician( maybe as the inventor of handcuffs but certainly not someone who would do stuff with them).Tina Turner wouldn’t have gotten as many heads turning if she had clung on to Anna Mae Bullock.

So moral of the story is….get a spunky name to stay ahead in the game.Infact in a fit of exaggeration as us humorists are prone to (and paid for),I would say all that matters really is the name contributing as much as 90 % to a persons fame and the rest 10% coming from those measly overrated things called talent and hard work.